From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 24 21: 1: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EDB137BD53 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 21:00:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from unfurl@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 35049 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Feb 2000 05:00:51 -0000 Date: 24 Feb 2000 21:00:51 -0800 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 21:00:51 -0800 From: Bill Swingle To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Mike Tancsa , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anon FTP setup on Feb 23 SNAP Message-ID: <20000224210050.C34888@dub.net> References: <20000224195103.A31954@dub.net> <23039.951452941@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <23039.951452941@zippy.cdrom.com>; from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com on Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:29:01PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:29:01PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > I just did an install of the Feb 22 snap. The new wording for the anon > > ftp section is really screwy. It's been turned around. The old straight > > forward "Do you want to enable anon ftp?" was fine. > > It's been turned around because people usually just hit return without > reading the dialogs and I didn't think defaulting to anonymous ftp > access was an especially good idea. :) I agree but the wording is a bit weird. Maybe it should read: "Do you want to enable anon ftp?" but if they just hit return it defaults to no. -Bill -- -=| --- B i l l S w i n g l e --- http://www.dub.net/ -=| unfurl@dub.net - unfurl@freebsd.org - bill@cdrom.com -=| Different all twisty a of in maze are you, passages little To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message