From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 9 10:48:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F144737B404 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebsd.org.ru (www.freebsd.org.ru [194.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2FC43F93 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:48:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org.ru) Received: by freebsd.org.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 56D2D310; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 21:48:05 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 21:48:05 +0400 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: Xavier Beaudouin Message-ID: <20030709174805.GN72006@freebsd.org.ru> References: <20030709163808.GK72006@freebsd.org.ru> <9860C808-B22C-11D7-9174-000393B64262@oav.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9860C808-B22C-11D7-9174-000393B64262@oav.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: Vivek Khera Subject: Re: ports/52877: Non-Maintainer-Update: mail/postfix add support VDA softquotas patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:48:08 -0000 On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Xavier Beaudouin wrote: > > Le mercredi, 9 jul 2003, ? 18:38 Europe/Paris, Sergey A. Osokin a ?crit > : > > >On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:33:18PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > >>>>>>>"XB" == Xavier Beaudouin writes: > >> > >>XB> Here is the patch for 2.0.13, notice that it is also available at > >>XB> http://www.oav.net/vda/postfix.patch as well > >> > >>Looks ok to me, except I disagree with the bump of PORTREVISION. It > >>is not necessary since no existing installations are affected. > > > >Hmm, I think Xavier Beaudouin add new functionality to this port, > >and the right way is bump PORTREVISION, isn't it? > > Bumping PORTREVISION may not be necessary... Since I added new > functionnality I was thinking it is a good idea. But this part for me > is not really important for me... OK. Another problem is place for patch postfix-2.0.13.v2.patch.gz and I think it must be at ports/distfiles/postfix, right? If answer is yes, I have a following: $ make ===> Extracting for postfix-2.0.13,1 >> Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-2.0.13.tar.gz. >> Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-2.0.13.v2.patch.gz. ===> Patching for postfix-2.0.13,1 ===> Applying distribution patches for postfix-2.0.13,1 File to patch: Any idea? -- Rgdz, /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / AGAINST HTML MAIL http://ozz.pp.ru/ X AND NEWS / \