From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 7 05:26:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170C716A4CE; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 05:26:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.cryptography.com (li-22.members.linode.com [64.5.53.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C626A43D54; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 05:26:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [10.0.5.51] (adsl-64-171-186-94.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.171.186.94]) by www.cryptography.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i775Qs8U003723; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:26:56 -0700 Message-ID: <4114681D.5020902@root.org> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 22:26:53 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <200408060450.i764ouJu097994@repoman.freebsd.org> <200408061014.22594.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200408061014.22594.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Nate Lawson cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica acpi_pci_link.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 05:26:58 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday 06 August 2004 12:50 am, Nate Lawson wrote: > >>njl 2004-08-06 04:50:56 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> sys/dev/acpica acpi_pci_link.c >> Log: >> Refine updates to PCI irq routing. Check _STA and _CRS but only print a >> message if they are incorrect. Also, remove the hack of allowing the >> initial irq setting to not be in _PRS. As before, the old behavior can >>be regained by defining ACPI_OLD_PCI_LINK. > > > Note that I had to back out this removal of the initial IRQ hack because it > broke things for many people. The problem is that the current link code > doesn't do a good job of picking virgin IRQs. > I plan to take this to the logical conclusion. I agree you were on the right track but didn't go far enough. :) I'll send patches in a few days. -- Nate