From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jul 2 13:34: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (draco.over-yonder.net [198.78.58.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166D137B406 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 13:34:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gh@over-yonder.net) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 1012) id 97ED162D0A; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:34:01 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:34:01 -0500 From: GH To: Damieon Stark Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unified pwutil library - thoughts? Message-ID: <20010702153401.A55131@over-yonder.net> References: <20010624210541.A12494@morpheus.mn.rr.com> <20010702113626.A21098@morpheus.mn.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010702113626.A21098@morpheus.mn.rr.com>; from visigoth@covertdata.com on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:36:26AM -0500 X-OS: FreeBSD Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:36:26AM -0500, some SMTP stream spewed forth: > > Hey all... > > So, by the fact that I got _no_ replies I must surmise that either my > message didn't get posted (confirmed posting with archive), or people > didn't read it, or _nobody_ thinks it is a good idea ;) but if nobody > thinks it is a good idea, I _think_ I would have gotten some flames/feedback. > Here goes again... Below is the message I sent about a unified libpwutil, and > possibly integrating it into FreeBSD. _ANY_ feedback, positive or negitive > would be appreciated as it will help to validate my existance ;) > It sounds like a good idea to me. It would be more efficient, cleaner, and easier to maintain and use. It would be rather non-standard, though. gh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message