From owner-freebsd-scsi Wed Mar 31 12:32:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from server.cirdan.iae.nl (server.cirdan.iae.nl [212.61.28.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8FF15CCF for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 12:32:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from graaf@cirdan.iae.nl) Received: from cirdan.iae.nl (cirdan.iae.nl [212.61.28.35]) by server.cirdan.iae.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179CFD98A; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 23:19:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 22:35:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Edwin de Graaf Reply-To: graaf@iae.nl Subject: Re: CAM timeout in dataout phase (3.1-STABLE) To: gibbs@plutotech.com Cc: admin@iae.nl, scsi@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199903312017.NAA17189@pluto.plutotech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Message-Id: <19990331211914.179CFD98A@server.cirdan.iae.nl> Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Justin, On 31 Mar, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > The motherboard has only one bus on it. The termination settings for > the controller should be "High Byte Termination Enabled", and "Low > Byte Termination Disabled". It may be that your motherboard always > terminates the high byte, but perhaps not. Active terminators may not > be sufficient for the load you are putting on this system. If active terminators are not sufficient, what would solve the problem? Would it help if we put the boot disk on a separate SCSI controller, thus shortening the total length of the SCSI bus? Or is a different kind of terminator better in this case? Your answers are much appreciated. best regards, Edwin de Graaf -- "O Oysters, come and walk with us!" The Walrus did beseech. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message