From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 17 23:07:07 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7989A106564A;
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7C78FC12;
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1c.sentex.ca [64.7.153.10])
	by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1HN75Mr043065;
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:07:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from pyroxene.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
	by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1HN74j6064947;
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:07:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
	by pyroxene.sentex.ca (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1HN74ml025580;
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:07:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <200902172307.n1HN74ml025580@pyroxene.sentex.ca>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:06:57 -0500
To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>,
	FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <499551B9.7050805@samsco.org>
References: <499551B9.7050805@samsco.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.1/8983/Thu Feb 12 07:48:01 2009
	clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on clamscanner2
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 64.7.153.18
Cc: 
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Major CAM performance regression
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:07:07 -0000

At 05:55 AM 2/13/2009, Scott Long wrote:

>If, instead, it reports a value of '1', you are likely affected.  Note
>that it may be normal for USB memory devices to report a low number.
>Also, many legacy SCSI disks, and devices that are not disks, may 
>also be expected to report a low number.

Hi Scott,
         I tested with the patch on my areca controller, and it still 
reports 1 post patch.  (On RELENG_6, it shows 255 with the same controller)

         ---Mike