Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:47:50 +0200 From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org, "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BUG: Entries in fstab with 'late' option, require order, with ntfs and ufs Message-ID: <20110901.154750.578.2@DEV> In-Reply-To: <201108300824.01387.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20110829.180846.937.1@DEV> <201108300824.01387.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message -----
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Cc: rank1seeker@gmail.com, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:24:01 -0400
Subject: Re: BUG: Entries in fstab with 'late' option, require order, with ntfs and ufs
> On Monday, August 29, 2011 2:08:46 pm rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote:
> > This yields successfull boot
> > --
> > /dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567 /usr/DOC ufs rw,late 0 0
> > /dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567 /usr/SRC ufs ro,late,noatime 0
> 0
> >
> > # This are WinXP drives:
> > /dev/ada0s1 /mnt/win_c ntfs
> rw,mountprog=/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0
> > /dev/ada0s5 /mnt/win_d ntfs
> rw,mountprog=/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0
> > /dev/ada0s6 /mnt/win_e ntfs
> rw,mountprog=/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0
> > --
> >
> >
> > This yields kick, in a single user mode
> > --
> > # This are WinXP drives:
> > /dev/ada0s1 /mnt/win_c ntfs
> rw,mountprog=/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0
> > /dev/ada0s5 /mnt/win_d ntfs
> rw,mountprog=/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0
> > /dev/ada0s6 /mnt/win_e ntfs
> rw,mountprog=/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0
> >
> > /dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567 /usr/DOC ufs rw,late 0 0
> > /dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567 /usr/SRC ufs ro,late,noatime 0
> 0
> > --
> >
> > dmesg part:
> > --
> > Mounting late file systems:NTFS signature is missing.
> > Failed to mount '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567': Invalid argument
> > The device '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS.
> > Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a
> > partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around?
> > NTFS signature is missing.
> > Failed to mount '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567': Invalid argument
> > The device '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS.
> > Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a
> > partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around?
> > .
> > Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup aborted
> > ERROR: ABORTING BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)!
> > Aug 29 20:02:31 blackhole init: /bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally,
> going
> > to single user mode
> > Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh:
>
> Hmm, seems like mountprog isn't being "cleared". Try this patch to
> sbin/mount:
>
> Index: mount.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mount.c (revision 225077)
> +++ mount.c (working copy)
> @@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ mountfs(const char *vfstype, const char *spec, con
> for (i = 1; i < mnt_argv.c; i++)
> (void)printf(" %s", mnt_argv.a[i]);
> (void)printf("\n");
> + free(optbuf);
> + free(mountprog);
> + mountprog = NULL;
> return (0);
> }
>
> @@ -599,6 +602,8 @@ mountfs(const char *vfstype, const char *spec, con
> }
>
> free(optbuf);
> + free(mountprog);
> + mountprog = NULL;
>
> if (verbose) {
> if (statfs(name, &sf) < 0) {
>
>
>
> John Baldwin
>
I failed to apply your patch on 8.2 RELEASE i386
--
cd /usr/src/sbin/mount
patch < ~/mount_patch.diff
--
Patch complained about line 6
Anyway, I've patched it manually and it works now!
Good job John ...
;)
Domagoj Smolčić
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110901.154750.578.2>