From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 4 12:33:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3958E16A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 12:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD61443D49 for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 12:33:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i34JWT8a031968; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 12:32:29 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 12:33:28 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200404040153.11429.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> <200404041421.40361.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> <200404041227.58240.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200404041227.58240.kstewart@owt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404041233.28683.kstewart@owt.com> cc: jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com Subject: Re: ports hosed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 19:33:31 -0000 On Sunday 04 April 2004 12:27 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Sunday 04 April 2004 12:21 pm, Jay Moore wrote: > > On Sunday 04 April 2004 08:07 am, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > # portupgrade -f lang/ruby18 > > > > Stale dependency: ruby-1.8.1_2 --> openssl-0.9.7d -- manually > > > > run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. > > > > # pkgdb -F > > > > ---> Checking the package registry database > > > > Stale dependency: openldap-client-2.1.29 -> openssl-0.9.7d > > > > (security/openssl): openoffice-1.1.0_1 (score:23%) ? > > > > ---- ---- > > > > > > What is this? I don't understand the question... Is this > > > > documented anywhere? > > > > > > You didn't do a portupgrade -rRa. The easy way is to upgrade or > > > install openssl-0.9.7d. > > > > Thanks, Kent. I was following the procedure in /usr/ports/UPDATING, > > and the question seemed so out of context... I mean > > "openoffice-1.1.0_1(score:23%)" - what's with that? > > > > Anyway, as I read ports-using.html from the Handbook, portupgrade > > -a is a "superset" of "portupgrade -rRa"... is that correct? > > > > Bottom line here (in my case) is this: I'm afraid my ports tree may > > be BFU; this all started when I tried to install the "K3b" port > > which apparently has a bazillion dependencies. At least one of the > > tar.gz files couldn't be located, and things have kind of gone > > downhill from there :( For me, I'm afraid that salvation may > > require "wiping" the entire ports tree, and re-installing it from > > the 5.2 cd. Is there a safe & clean way to do that? > > It was the closest thing to openssl. There is what I think is a > problem with ports such as openssl. It is in the makefile to > portupgrade but if you do a make search, it doesn't show up. When you > see an obvious link problem like you saw, check if you have it > installed. If you do/don't just upgrade/install what is missing. It is a dependancy to ruby-1.8 but it wasn't installed/upgraded for some reason. The same logic for a solution applies. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html