From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 9 11:51:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E92B16A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:51:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outmx017.isp.belgacom.be (outmx017.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6A043D45 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:51:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geert@lori.mine.nu) Received: from outmx017.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id i89BpOkx021162 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 13:51:25 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from lori.mine.nu (80-16.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.16.80]) with ESMTP id i89BpNB4021149; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 13:51:23 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: by lori.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 290E49C7; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 13:51:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 13:51:22 +0200 From: Geert Hendrickx To: cpghost@cordula.ws Message-ID: <20040909115122.GA52787@lori.mine.nu> References: <20040909105232.GA51740@lori.mine.nu> <20040909114033.GA2039@bsdevil.farid-hajji.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040909114033.GA2039@bsdevil.farid-hajji.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-GPG-Key: http://lori.mine.nu/gnupgkey.asc X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/766C1E92 X-Accept-Language: nl,en cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what is -DNOPROFILE ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 11:51:28 -0000 On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 01:40:33PM +0200, cpghost@cordula.ws wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 12:52:32PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering what this make.conf-flag is for: > > > > NOPROFILE= true # Avoid compiling profiled libraries > > > > What are "profiled" libraries? > > /usr/lib/lib*_p.{a,so} > > See gprof(1) So, if I understand it correctly from gprof(1), profiled libraries are for measuring how much CPU time is spent in each suboutine? And, as a regular user (not a developer or benchmarker), I don't need this and can use -DNOPROFILE for not building profiled libraries? I also understand these libraries are seperate from my "regular" libraries? So, is there a drawback (other than increased compile time for a make world) in building them? Or does it not matter? GH