From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 22 23:48:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19185106568B for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E398FC21 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 22 Aug 2009 19:48:11 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.6-GA) with ESMTP id QCT46691; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:48:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Auth-ID: roberthuff Received: from 209-6-159-252.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO [209.6.159.252]) ([209.6.159.252]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 22 Aug 2009 19:48:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4A9083AD.4080305@rcn.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:47:57 -0400 From: Robert Huff User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nerius Landys References: <560f92640908212137s376f1dc8vaba59618a6b71d67@mail.gmail.com> <20090822164219.1d439ae4@gumby.homeunix.com> <560f92640908221213p2e426650x3bcad3b93de4d4a3@mail.gmail.com> <560f92640908221226o5da22c8frae08de57520d98be@mail.gmail.com> <560f92640908221614vacd66ega4a56b79d3a59db6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <560f92640908221614vacd66ega4a56b79d3a59db6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d/named dilemma X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:48:14 -0000 Nerius Landys wrote: > I am still bambuzzled by the network taking 30 seconds to come up. I don't remember the original description, but any time I hear about a 30 second "gap" during startup, I think of the well-known DNS reverse look-up issue. Are you sure this is not the case here? Robert Huff