Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:57:23 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere and ports overlay support Message-ID: <cafa8ba4-3c78-ef15-5152-c3ba4f3b531f@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <537d9683-43e2-2f55-d819-aab39d96fde1@quip.cz> References: <d6f8a918-de37-6c04-3797-4b4bb712c780@quip.cz> <d1babc1c-5ee5-30c8-87d2-46434e2a35fb@netfence.it> <537d9683-43e2-2f55-d819-aab39d96fde1@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2019-10-25 15:32, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >... > As I understand it should be possible to have default ports tree > synchronised by SVN or Git with official tree and the second tree with > private ports only, called for example "myports" (/usr/myports) > Then in make.conf define OVERLAYS= /usr/myports and the ports framework > should lookup first at the /usr/myports then /usr/ports. > If /usr/myports contains some changes in Mk/Uses files, they should be > applied too. Thanks. I'll definitely look into it, as portshaker is slow. > But it didn't work with poudriere. That would be a showstopper, though. bye & Thanks av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cafa8ba4-3c78-ef15-5152-c3ba4f3b531f>