From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 21 00:36:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA04288 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:36:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from baloon.mimi.com (sjx-ca126-30.ix.netcom.com [207.92.177.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA04280 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:36:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by baloon.mimi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA20711; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:35:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:35:59 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199801210835.AAA20711@baloon.mimi.com> To: dev.random@dev.random.nu CC: baum@abirnet.co.il, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (dev.random@dev.random.nu) Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk is broken From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk * IMHO, this is a flaw, but what can you do.. besides nuke the files from * the locations, or tell bsd.port.mk not to check. (grep -i tcl * /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk to see where it checks). You can get by it for now by defining NO_IGNORE when calling make. * would be much nicer to grab TCL_VERSION out of tcl.h, but when I presented * that to him I never got a reply.. It is because it is not checking the release version of tcl/tk, it is checking whether you are using a version installed by an old FreeBSD system (either src or ports)! I told you exactly that in mail, you sent me another one suggesting me to grab TCL_VERSION (which has nothing to do with the "version" we are talking here), so I ignored it. Sorry about that, but I was kinda busy you know. Satoshi