Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:44:00 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 283304] Re: mark as PIE_UNSAFE (+) call for review the commits Message-ID: <bug-283304-7788-r4pXLQBZ2N@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-283304-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-283304-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D283304 Benjamin Takacs <nimaje+fbz@bureaucracy.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nimaje+fbz@bureaucracy.de --- Comment #1 from Benjamin Takacs <nimaje+fbz@bureaucracy.de> --- As (sadly) WITH_PIE isn't default (and not even really useable, see bug 272898), this isn't a security regression (if all those commits do is setti= ng PIE_UNSAFE for ports that don't build WITH_PIE (which I suspect to be the c= ase, based on the sample of those commits I looked at)). To me it seems more like an attempt to make more of the ports tree build wh= en using WITH_PIE, so that it hopefully can be default in the future, without investing time *now* in figuring the exact reason why WITH_PIE doesn't work= for those ports and fixing them (that can happen while they are marked PIE_UNSA= FE). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-283304-7788-r4pXLQBZ2N>