From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 19 16:20:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89A116A4CE for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 16:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wb2-a.mail.utexas.edu (wb2-a.mail.utexas.edu [128.83.126.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4761543D1F for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 16:20:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from osilva@scuff.cc.utexas.edu) Received: (qmail 26080 invoked from network); 19 May 2004 23:19:44 -0000 Received: from chepe.cc.utexas.edu (HELO chepe.scuff.cc.utexas.edu) (128.83.135.25) by wb2.mail.utexas.edu with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 May 2004 23:19:44 -0000 Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040519181936.026a6460@scuff.cc.utexas.edu> X-Sender: osilva@scuff.cc.utexas.edu (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 18:19:59 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Oscar Ricardo Silva In-Reply-To: <048e01c43d10$1b4711b0$0300a8c0@bucktester> References: <048e01c43d10$1b4711b0$0300a8c0@bucktester> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: network traffic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 23:20:49 -0000 At 02:41 PM 5/18/2004, you wrote: >any one know were I can get a netwrk testing tool that can sit on a >server and test the speed of a network connection.. I have a small >network ot work and I get computers that just disappear off the >net..different computer at different times. but most of the time they >are on the net and just are so slow. I have check for virus's and adware >and changed the switching hub out..I have even replaced every network >cable in the place.... > > >I would like two programs that sit on two computer and just talk to each >other and tell what the speed they are talking and if there is a packet >loss iperf or netperf? Oscar