From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 04:09:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA6D169 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 04:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22d.google.com (mail-qg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04A8EE3E for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 04:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id z60so3819747qgd.4 for ; Thu, 08 May 2014 21:09:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7CekH+eGRim1MKju3YmvpQeV8sDCEufndL02MXcOr1Y=; b=JqWyqqvFjnEudci7xJlUye6VTl21eck72oVf0wuRNNP6ag4zErGhcJNsUNzGDt8BXm 9MntKK8GQMAwggWRQ+IMwTxd1FQ9vmpG001jOhwNtHGODmUMAtTddThqLeRuytvUjCMI 1fJ/VQpocg2Myl914nncNAn4JqZSVu5csuF+YaNDFODZfMqfbOhNdiinoxDVjyap0ASc TQCuUIrEX63lYLWwi/8/ULsl47hXn2tY4pT1kQ/mdySQkWuC0c902HlcFXNCt3gUDDiE Op1zVX448zzLRSQrnuO6uAI+ylzrOCCv1o8KRU+r9YUgKECKWdCRovpC85vyYKMJfkSO 7D5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.16.199 with SMTP id p7mr11220191qaa.76.1399608549048; Thu, 08 May 2014 21:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.191.201 with HTTP; Thu, 8 May 2014 21:09:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20396.1399607298@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> References: <20140226123709.GA31099@syn.pertho.net> <530EE7F4.3080903@shurik.kiev.ua> <24791.1393550277@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <75498.1398751548@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <84650.1398819225@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <14909.1399545008@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <20396.1399607298@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 21:09:08 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: O56Ozh9PwPU0fnUTdxf2P7pvc-o Message-ID: Subject: Re: Centrino Wireless-N 1000 support is also broken (Re: iwn(4) in -HEAD supporting Centrino Wireless-N 135) From: Adrian Chadd To: Kaho Toshikazu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 04:09:10 -0000 Ok, lemme commit the config fix. Thanks for persisting with this! -a On 8 May 2014 20:48, Kaho Toshikazu wrote: > Hello, > > Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> So what's the value of txchainmask and rxchainmask from the EEPROM? >> before things get overridden? >> >> I'd like to figure out what that changed. > > In both before and after applying the patch, sc->txchainmask=1, > sc->rxchainmask=3, ntxsteams=1. I think that 1st breakage > introduced by r258030 in the function iwn_set_link_quality() > was already fixed by r258085. > > 2nd breakage introduced by r258035 seems to be fixed by the patch. > Because 2nd breakage was introduced before 1st breakage was fixed, > we faced to a difficulty tracking down the problem. > I don't know a meaning of a parameter .calib_need, > but it is something wrong and it is corrected by the patch. > > -- > Kaho Toshikazu > >