From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 16:29:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D5D16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:29:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from silver.he.iki.fi (helenius.fi [193.64.42.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EB243D72 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:29:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from [193.64.42.134] (h86.vuokselantie10.fi [193.64.42.134]) by silver.he.iki.fi (8.13.1/8.11.4) with ESMTP id i9QGTNTY008163; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:29:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Message-ID: <417E7B65.3050607@he.iki.fi> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:29:25 +0300 From: Petri Helenius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Malachowski References: <20041026153108.GA91134@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> In-Reply-To: <20041026153108.GA91134@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:29:29 -0000 Pawel Malachowski wrote: >Hello, > >I would like to ask people using mpd about performance on particular hardware >setups. I am interested in the numbers of sessions (probably PPTP with weak >encryption) and total bandwith, that can be achieved with, e.g.: >. 300MHz CPU, >. 1GHz CPU, >. 2GHz CPU. > > Although I'm not expert on mpd, I couldn't resist mentioning that not all MHz are created equal and you probably achieve more performance difference by carefully choosing a well performing NIC than the absolute MHz on the box. Pete >Won't PPPoE behave better than PPTP? (My goals are authentication and >performace.) >I guess poptop will be much slower and is not a good solution for bigger >setup (since it works entirely in userland)? >I'm talking about small ISP environment, about 100-200 simultaneous >connections over LAN, about 5-10Mbit/s total bandwith. > > >TIA, > >