From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 31 12:17:44 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA03085 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 12:17:44 -0800 Received: from star-gate.com (hasty.vip.best.com [204.156.141.143]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA03073 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 12:17:40 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by star-gate.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA00408; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 11:55:16 GMT Message-Id: <199503311155.LAA00408@star-gate.com> X-Authentication-Warning: star-gate.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6alpha 2/16/95 To: Bruce Evans cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: help with splbio, splnet, spl... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 01 Apr 1995 02:39:08 +1000." <199503311639.CAA05170@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 31 Mar 1995 11:55:14 +0000 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>> Bruce Evans said: > >Not sure if it is related to the way that interrupt is being handle.. > >Why is the boot sequence slower than 1.1.5? > > I mean going out and recognizing the devices that are attached > > to the system, etc.. > > It's not related. There are more drivers now :-). > Has anyone noticed a slowed down of the booting sequence even after trimming down the kernel ? Amancio