From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 4 19:57:15 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3515716A418 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F039913C4DB for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283C110E890; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 21:57:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g2ntcCF+7a7Q; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 21:57:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DANGER-PC (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C166710E85E; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 21:57:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 21:56:24 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <254457482.20071004215624@rulez.sk> To: "Aryeh Friedman" In-Reply-To: References: <009a01c806bc$5c7021d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Scheduler selection for web hosting X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:57:15 -0000 Hello Aryeh, Thursday, October 4, 2007, 9:34:48 PM, you wrote: > On 10/4/07, Artem Kuchin wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I have read that in 7-Current there are two schedulers. >> 4BSD - which, AFAIK, is a renamed new SMP scheduler, but i'm not sure >> ULE > According to the scheduler team the only reason why ULE is not the > standard scheduler is it has poor performance on single processor > machines. Where did you get that info from and what is "the scheduler team" ? -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org