Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 20:10:35 -0700 From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM> To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I thought some of you may find this interesting.... Message-ID: <199708090310.UAA04755@kithrup.com> In-Reply-To: <199708090031.RAA12911.kithrup.freebsd.chat@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199708090031.RAA12911.kithrup.freebsd.chat@rah.star-gate.com> you write: >Not sure if it makes a difference however I placed public.com on >my sendmail kill file. You shouldn't. They're victims of forgery. (the domain has been put on hold, admittedly. The owner probably got tired of the problems.) If you look at the header, you see: >Received: from ctynet.com (root@[205.199.4.215] (may be forged)) > by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA12551 > for <hasty@star-gate.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 15:35:41 -0700 (PDT) That is the network I have labeled as "sallynet". They are an AGIS customer. I have them blocked. My machine rebooted around 3AM today (Friday); since that time: sallynet localhost UGR 0 266 lo0 - - 266 packet attempts. Bastards. >X-advertisement: Visit http://www.iemmc.org for name removal information. There have, to date, been dozens of proofs that this does not work. This will land AGIS, CP, sallynet, quantumcom, etc., in serious trouble. The sooner the better.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708090310.UAA04755>