From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 13 07:13:13 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA23599 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 07:13:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from battra.telebase.com (root@battra.telebase.com [192.132.57.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id HAA23589 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 07:13:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from wormhole.telebase.com by battra.telebase.com id KAA11357; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:13:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from odo.telebase.com (odo.telebase.com [172.16.2.217]) by wormhole.telebase.com (8.8.3/8.8.1) with ESMTP id KAA17447; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:13:00 -0500 (EST) Received: (from bmc@localhost) by odo.telebase.com (8.8.3/8.8.1) id KAA08741; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:13:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:13:00 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199612131513.KAA08741@odo.telebase.com> From: Brian Clapper To: Josh Gilliam Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, bmc@n2k.com, bmc@WillsCreek.COM Subject: Re: "linuxls" In-Reply-To: <21201948@toto.iv> Organization: N2K Inc Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Josh" == Josh Gilliam writes: Josh> I downloaded latest GNU fileutils from ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu/ Josh> and found that the port name "linuxls" is inappropriate. I suggest Josh> the name be changed to "gnuls". Josh, I haven't looked at the latest version of fileutils. I assume you're implying that the latest GNU fileutils `ls' has rolled in the Linux colorization. If so, you're right, the port name probably ought to be changed. I should also update to the port to use the latest GNU source. I'll look into it. Thanks. ---- Brian Clapper, bmc@WillsCreek.COM -or- bmc@n2k.com Once upon a time, in a galaxy far, far away...