From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 08:25:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1724637B401; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD2243F3F; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:25:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (acs-24-154-229-196.zoominternet.net [24.154.229.196]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5HFP4kR002815; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:25:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:13:55 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Marc Fonvieille Message-Id: <20030617111355.6c8eeb90.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030616211505.GC550@nosferatu.blackend.org> References: <20030616171455.GB550@nosferatu.blackend.org> <20030616132114.368a354c.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030616211505.GC550@nosferatu.blackend.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: docs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removal of some mini-faqs in the Handbook. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:25:12 -0000 On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:15:05 +0200 Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > I know very well that section since I wrote it :) I just noted the > removal of the mini-faq when I sent an user to the section 6.3 (I do > not read every commit mail). > The person complained about the Troubleshooting section layout. > If you really think the new layout is better than the previous one, > then that's Ok. My opinion is not: "keep the old layout", I just > want something easy to read. > By the way, you should keep the info about performance issues with > autoselect mode on some NICs since this mode is not seen by users as > an "incorrect network settings". > > For mail-trouble.html, I just hope it will be treated in a better way. I'm sorry if I have not given enough justice to your work, any suggestions on improving what I did? -- Tom Rhodes