From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 5 19:45:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF36B1065687 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13AB8FC18 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mA5JjZCO056542 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:45:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:45:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:45:10 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20081105194506.GA18676@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 22 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: Subject: console locked again:: load over 2.00 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:45:18 -0000 Hey guys, Any ideas *why* my load is so high when my desktop wasn't touched for 9, 10 hours? I was running mostly KDE3 konsoles, and had a few other processes going, the apps iconisized. The server is still running; I've killed everything I can think of to reduce the load. It may be that the screen won't come back if the load is > 1.00. I'm upgrading my kernel to see if *that* has any effect. O/wise, I'm out of ideas. Anybody?? gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org