From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb 14 02:00:01 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA28899
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 14 Feb 1998 02:00:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA28873
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 14 Feb 1998 01:59:56 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA11622; Sat, 14 Feb 1998 01:58:36 -0800 (PST)
To: NAGAO -abtk- Tadaaki <nagao@cs.titech.ac.jp>
cc: luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, nate@mt.sri.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Problems with new sound code? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 14 Feb 1998 18:46:28 +0900."
             <19980214184628P.nagao@wo-ppp1.cs.titech.ac.jp> 
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 01:58:36 -0800
Message-ID: <11619.887450316@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> LINT includes the DEVFS option with a comment "experimental but seems
> to work", so, don't you think it is better to make kernel compile smoothly
> even with DEVFS?

Actually, any references to DEVFS in -stable should probably
be ripped out; it's unlikely that it'll ever be completed
in that branch and I've certainly always seen it as a purely
3.0 related feature.

					Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message