From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 29 11:38:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.webmaster.com (mail.webmaster.com [209.133.28.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2601513F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 11:38:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davids@webmaster.com) Received: from whenever ([209.133.29.2]) by shell.webmaster.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35) with SMTP id com; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 11:38:31 -0700 From: "David Schwartz" To: "Jeffrey J. Libman" , Subject: RE: routing over a dual t1 connection (fwd) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 11:38:31 -0700 Message-ID: <000801bed9f1$8e8e2aa0$021d85d1@youwant.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The best solution I've tried, though far from the cheapest, is to get a CSU/DSU for each end that can 'fuse' the two lines and provide a single serial port at twice the speed of a single T1. If your T1 card can run at 3.088Mbps, you are set. This way, nothing has to change in your routing configuration. Every other solution I've played with has suffered from the following drawbacks: 1) Poor failover if a single line fails. 2) Grossly unequal distribution of traffic. 3) Many packets received out of order. DS > hi. currently my connection is over a single line (isdn), using a unix box > and gated with rip/rip2 protocol and what is basically static routes. > > i now have the opportunity to move to a t1, possibly 2 t1's. > > i don NOT wish at this time to multi-home my net, but to put both t1's > into my upstream provider in order to get the bandwidth. > > i understand how routing over 2 interfaces works when you are dual homed, > using an as number and bgp4, etc. > > how do i effect routing over 2 interfaces, when i want them to be, in > effect, 1 interface, double the bandwidth? is this the "balancing" i keep > seeing threads about on this list? > > any pointers will be appreciated. > > thanks in advance. > > cheers, > jeff > > | > |\ > +------------------------------+ > Jeffrey J. Libman, ops. mgr. | \ | Wantabe Internet > Services | > Wantabe, Inc. |__\ > +------------------------------+ > jeffrl@wantabe.com <-----|------> | access web cgi > ftp news mail | > (281) 493-0718 __,.-=\'`^`'~=-../__,.-= > +------------------------------+ > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message