From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  6 13:46:05 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70BE8F61
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  6 May 2015 13:46:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AA1A185B
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  6 May 2015 13:46:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t46Dk5Lk029639
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 6 May 2015 13:46:05 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 199820] [new port] www/rubygem-html-pipeline
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 13:46:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-199820-13-5VOa09UH3M@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 13:46:05 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199820

--- Comment #9 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
Each port has a log history available on freshports.  If I were going to try to
figure out why a port existed, I'd look there, which probably references a PR
which has even more history.

Is is a lot of work, but it is certainly not an impossible or even unreasonable
task, especially when rubygems that are dependencies of other ports can be
removed off the list.  maybe the list would shrink from 80 to 20, who knows?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.