Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Jan 2002 11:50:59 -0500
From:      "Doug Reynolds" <mav@wastegate.net>
To:        "Cliff Sarginson" <cliff@raggedclown.net>, "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Postfix port binding problem
Message-ID:  <20020106164920.5A2A448410@wastegate.net>
In-Reply-To: <20020106140219.GA1067@raggedclown.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 15:02:19 +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:

>Mmm. Interesting, I will be totally honest and say I have never heard of this
>until now, it must be some kind of well kept secret.
>Or  perhap I am not widely read enough.
>But to argue my point, it is totally unnecessary to "wrap" postfix
>anyway, since postfix is a plug-in replacement for sendmail.
>Such a wrapper serves no useful purpose for replacing sendmail
>with postfix.
>
>I suppose this may help with qmail which is in a world of it's own.
>
>I also doubt the utility of such a program in real life, how many MTA's
>does anyone run on one machine at any one time ?

definately.  I ran sendmail, switched to qmail, and then to postfix. 
but not all at the same time. :)

---
doug reynolds | the maverick | mav@wastegate.net

PGP Public Key Fingerprint: 6E7B 9993 B503 6D45  E33A 2019 26E5 C1DB



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020106164920.5A2A448410>