From owner-freebsd-java Sat Apr 10 8:13: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B6315048; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 08:12:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA05122; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:10:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id JAA08971; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:10:42 -0600 Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:10:42 -0600 Message-Id: <199904101510.JAA08971@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Chuck Robey Cc: Archie Cobbs , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system. In-Reply-To: References: <199904100551.WAA93232@bubba.whistle.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > As long as we can bring it in conditionally, have libgcj is possibly > more important to FreeBSD than you'd think. Realize there are a large > number of us out there doing Java development (I'm only doing it for > classes now, but there's a lot of folks doing this) and since there's no > Java2 yet for FreeBSD, it's a drawback. I have Solaris7 at my elbow > here, *extremely* unwillingly, only because I need Java2. Is libgcj and the like Java2 compliant? I was under the impression that it was less 'featureful' than the JDK1 stuff the porting team released? Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message