From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Tue Dec 11 19:34:34 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466A113113D8; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:34:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f48.google.com (mail-io1-f48.google.com [209.85.166.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85BD169AC1; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f48.google.com with SMTP id l14so12789448ioj.5; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:34:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ccFktZfQ6RKD+dfvN1UvWNkZydaBL8Qz5cWvjTpVU4E=; b=aCuEomZY9KL/vA4D/HzdIFkJ0eHo2EWhWu+MUYf3UmeXUtxvKAXCHR4It/8CErvbIY V5GSmDYAaGa6uZLwt24U31ifDFDYDrNg4W+8SDORBQ6MKNQZI0kZBPYT4UrzYmcNhEyI 1Ia9nOSHrKhVng9IqLpRCW3R/KCYjlbVfay7MPluQjn92h3prYp6thHLAjNcR2+5Rgo7 23pggSkB9puDOmmEXvuR76qvt+0RlkK1PPofrUl5E6d8kTFOajTvBTA6j/N3GYiWOalF b64UM3QDpGh29oTlJlyREMuxgrffrV3hcwa5ooyS5260okc+6b/8vbuFjfvkj+dNPm/B qZyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYYOUWv6fgkv2NfKxfNW9rMBECarDBQl34WPrfwo85uE9K7y1Eh 9GuOUagjiIjJlef8Ny/XXVBY9Vz9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/V9P+ME3XyJMKRtC47nmKyMNY51ENaAEyGK9q3yGAFTXUE65OKKjY5MNpEeSYRGnBPMhW8I3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:919:: with SMTP id t25mr13726828ioi.207.1544556533422; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:28:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-it1-f173.google.com (mail-it1-f173.google.com. [209.85.166.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e68sm2432592ite.7.2018.12.11.11.28.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:28:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-it1-f173.google.com with SMTP id z7so5392917iti.0; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:28:52 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a24:5411:: with SMTP id t17mr3233212ita.32.1544556532832; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:28:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201812110138.wBB1cp1p006660@repo.freebsd.org> <2a76b295-b2da-3015-c201-dbe0ec63ca5a@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <2a76b295-b2da-3015-c201-dbe0ec63ca5a@FreeBSD.org> Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:28:41 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r341803 - head/libexec/rc To: John Baldwin Cc: src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 85BD169AC1 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of csecem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=csecem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.92 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.985,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[48.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.92)[ip: (-9.72), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.54), asn: 15169(-1.27), country: US(-0.09)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com] X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:34:34 -0000 On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 9:24 AM John Baldwin wrote: > list_vars is rarely used outside of > 'netif', so it probably doesn't make a measurable difference on bare metal. To clarify: It likely doesn't make a measurable difference *to boot times* on bare metal, but even on amd64 bare metal the time of list_vars itself is readily measurable; the 71% reduction quoted in the commit log was measured on amd64. Best, Conrad