From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Feb 21 21:30:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA16110 for freebsd-smp-outgoing; Sat, 21 Feb 1998 21:30:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from imo20.mx.aol.com (imo20.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA16105 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 1998 21:30:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from StevenR362@aol.com) From: StevenR362@aol.com Received: from StevenR362@aol.com by imo20.mx.aol.com (IMOv12/Dec1997) id HBBQa03199 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 00:29:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <63382b52.34efb7d6@aol.com> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 00:29:55 EST To: smp@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: SMP options. Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 64 Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I just got my new smp system running for the first time today. The rslock bug had me thinking that I had bum hardware until I applied John Dyson's patch. Anyways, I have questions as to which if any kernel options are not valid or are mandatory. I could move the rslock panic around and exhibit different simptoms depending on config file flags and options selected. In particular, are options "VM86", and USER_LDT valid with a SMP kernel and is option FAILSAFE mandatory? Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message