From owner-freebsd-hardware  Mon Jul 22 16:50:39 1996
Return-Path: owner-hardware
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA22092
          for hardware-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 16:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay-5.mail.demon.net (relay-5.mail.demon.net [158.152.1.48])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA21994
          for <hardware@freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 16:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from post.demon.co.uk by relay-5.mail.demon.net  id ap18368;
          23 Jul 96 0:28 +0100
Received: from jraynard.demon.co.uk ([158.152.42.77]) by relay-3.mail.demon.net
          id aa07931; 22 Jul 96 23:45 +0100
Received: (from fhdware@localhost) by jraynard.demon.co.uk (8.7.5/8.6.12) id RAA02118; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 17:26:20 GMT
From: James Raynard <fhdware@jraynard.demon.co.uk>
Message-Id: <199607221726.RAA02118@jraynard.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: The multiple COM ports discussion
To: schofiel@xs4all.nl
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 17:26:20 +0000 ()
Cc: hardware@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199607221032.MAA27626@xs2.xs4all.nl> from "schofiel@xs4all.nl" at Jul 22, 96 12:32:03 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> As a result, I would like to suggest that I write
> an article andpost it here. If anyone would like this, willyou please
> post and I will be glad to oblige.

Yes please!  Or even better, why not convert it to SGML and submit
to the Documentation Project (once everyone's managed to reach a 
consensus, that is :-)

There are some empty slots in the Handbook that this would fit
nicely into...