From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 1 6: 7:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lloydix.2y.net (wks-166-154-199.kscable.com [24.166.154.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878DA37B401 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 06:07:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glandix@lloydix.2y.net) Received: from localhost (glandix@localhost) by lloydix.2y.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f61D7lw13258 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 08:07:47 -0500 Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 08:07:43 -0500 (CDT) From: gLaNDix To: Subject: newbie question about ports Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sorry about the "newbie-ish" questions, but I haven't found anything that addresses the following questions very thoroughly. I come from about a 5-year linux background, but am *very* close to making the plunge to FreeBSD, probably as soon as these are answered... 1.) When you use cvsup to update the ports tree, does that update the ports to the level of the kernel (ie: are the ports -RELEASE quality, or are they -STABLE/-CURRENT quality?) 2.) Let's say I have foobar-1.0 installed from the ports collection. A few days later foobar-1.2 comes out. Can I upgrade to 1.2 by first updating the ports tree (atleast for foobar) and running 'make install'? Or will this cause the same potential problem downloading the "non-port" source and installing it on top of the original port install? (ie: will this leave extra files laying around, or does it automatically take care of that problem?) Thanks a lot! Jesse Kaufman <<< Linux lloydix 2.4.5 #2 Sun Jun 10 21:09:18 CDT 2001 i586 unknown >>> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message