From nobody Fri Apr 19 13:47:51 2024 X-Original-To: xen@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VLbZ513Dfz5H5S5 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 13:47:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roger.pau@cloud.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VLbZ44RRPz4DCD for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 13:47:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roger.pau@cloud.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-344047ac7e4so1949399f8f.0 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:47:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=citrix.com; s=google; t=1713534473; x=1714139273; darn=freebsd.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IPAFG1dkw+ZSVQ2SwcEE7cv0rwxQoYqvkxtwo0Wq3Rs=; b=LUOwMxFIRDyZZW7BHrPJv8vscMgVI039pl95INwiJeVzeQ/H5yKU3ZT9usPr03Kbn3 ATn6T53jkaFrW6DQPYts8xYLJltrzkawpEbj6NiZcW6x98Hjav6fkZqYGXf6dvVnDdnC 3X+GdAreUsc8iplcGH84Ti+qAYWRCNVMzaESY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713534473; x=1714139273; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=IPAFG1dkw+ZSVQ2SwcEE7cv0rwxQoYqvkxtwo0Wq3Rs=; b=R+yKTKE62xObVSOcHbNjxXE5fsydKGlA7go2xCLNisRXxx1JcJNVNQDUqu/FGKDUhB Kg8HzwwAWOiHUSLhklLH/S2B+0hTs6mVKblXqq5uV5YKVZAl39Q+WRjt/KEq+dYwyvP5 EGXacHgV1PGjsK4H8LdhUMYmotL8MlUdYBJ03fK3AXy7MV214BhAOiWQ+tteVOna80L0 cYzadaXeQ2YBZRoJyXev3AtpHruqYmb7EPhRiWNxSs0Z/0GJ/AN1i7N89jktJ8emauv7 Ukj6aTjLjPOvGnSbGFjpn6SPK+GeVNS4IElQFEmB3/jLG3JZLKDe9ojPfsawSzMQstiR 9LqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyaNSD9+iY3pwJS0EHcmvPWxQ+EoRnyv02j0+HaFo18LAKnNjTw 1sUqz1kCvmTefZWS13dDAGQXxyvza1+UobTh7ZS692kyrydKSo9ixyC98f/3ZDK75SeoEKOT3bU U X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHCO7cJvjVQZ1qzLXuq5QSFiETz9iZ1tqbRjUViMJjj0LKzc+18Hf8LffdQ/PDrEuq4DL9lag== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1868:b0:349:af80:9b67 with SMTP id d8-20020a056000186800b00349af809b67mr4736982wri.30.1713534472906; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([85.31.135.62]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id je12-20020a05600c1f8c00b004183edc31adsm10254356wmb.44.2024.04.19.06.47.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:47:51 +0200 From: Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= To: Brian Buhrow Cc: xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd-13.1 as domu cannot use multiple virtual disks Message-ID: References: <202404191334.43JDYCRV008172@nfbcal.org> List-Id: Discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-xen List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202404191334.43JDYCRV008172@nfbcal.org> X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4VLbZ44RRPz4DCD On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 06:34:12AM -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote: > hello Roger. Thanks for the quick reply. Okay. I'll try the alternate lines. > Interestingly enough, I tried hda and hdb and they didn't work either. Weird, both the hd and the xvd notation seems to work for me. For the record my configuration is: disk = [ '/root/FreeBSD-15.0-CURRENT-amd64.raw,raw,xvda,rw', '/root/FreeBSD-14.0-RELEASE-amd64.raw,raw,xvdb,rw' ] > Also, for NetBSD domu's > the 0x1,0x2 syntax works beautifuly, so I was surprised it didn't work with the FreeBSD domu's. No idea, maybe NetBSD carries some patches in ports to support that syntax. AFAICT from the vbd format document that I linked on my previous reply it's not a valid notation. Regards, Roger.