From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 10:06:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECE537B401; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net (flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745EC43F93; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:06:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from parv_fm@mailsent.net) Received: from sdn-ap-013dcwashp0007.dialsprint.net ([63.188.128.7] helo=moo.holy.cow) by flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 193J2G-0000qv-00; Wed, 09 Apr 2003 10:06:56 -0700 Received: by moo.holy.cow (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 765B4D5EB; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:10:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:10:03 -0400 From: parv To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030409171003.GA50768@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, f-gnats References: <200304062346.h36NkRbN052478@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030407075136.GA1778@moo.holy.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030407075136.GA1778@moo.holy.cow> cc: f-gnats Subject: Re: ports/38602: x11-wm/tvtwm is confused about PREFIX X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 17:06:58 -0000 in message <20030407075136.GA1778@moo.holy.cow>, wrote parv thusly... > > in message <200304062346.h36NkRbN052478@freefall.freebsd.org>, > wrote Edwin Groothuis thusly... > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed ... > > State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 6 16:45:50 PDT 2003 > > State-Changed-Why: > > It installs properly here with PREFIX set to /home/edwin/X11R6-5. > > Problem is not solved yet. USE_X_PREFIX seem to override PREFIX; > empty +CONTENTS is put in the /var/db/pkg/tvtwm-pl11. Below is the > relevant output end of following commands... Could somebody please reopen this PR as this PR seemed to be steam-rolled over in order to close it. Problem still exists & i can reproduce on demand. If somebody need some form of debugging data not already submitted, i am more than willing to do that; just let me know what i need to do to generate that data. - parv --