From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 12 18:08:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C219210656C0; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A588FC2D; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.156] (adsl-241-168-59.bna.bellsouth.net [74.241.168.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2CI7Jpl026209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:07:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Jung-uk Kim In-Reply-To: <200903120942.44149.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <200903111233.14029.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <200903111507.42241.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <1236836518.1651.0.camel@wombat.2hip.net> <200903120942.44149.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FreeBSD Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:08:32 -0500 Message-Id: <1236881312.15631.2.camel@wombat.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:16:48 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] amd64 suspend/resume code to be comitted X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:08:44 -0000 On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 09:42 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Thursday 12 March 2009 01:41 am, Robert Noland wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 15:07 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > On Wednesday 11 March 2009 02:52 pm, Robert Noland wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 12:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > > > With popular demands, I will commit the following patch in > > > > > next few days unless a showstopper is found or > > > > > "over-my-dead-body" type of review is received. ;-) > > > > > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amd64_suspend-20090311.diff > > > > > > > > > > FYI, it was originally posted here: > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810211228.31028.jkim > > > > > > > > > > and here: > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812102120.03788.jkim > > > > > > > > > > Please read the original threads for more information about > > > > > the patch. > > > > > > > > Does this address SMP as well? Or is that still hanging out in > > > > the wind? > > > > > > Yes, it does. > > > > Cool, looking forward to it... > > Wait a minute. Are you talking about SMP i386? If so, the answer to > that question is no although it will be relatively easy to do fix > after the patch. This patch only address UP/SMP amd64. Oh, well... This is at least great progress... I was more interested in this when I was using a dual core laptop, but it's great that it's finally going in. robert. > Jung-uk Kim