From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jul 29 6:56: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sugar.pharlap.com (sugar.pharlap.com [192.107.36.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004D814E4E for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 06:55:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from clark@pharlap.com) Received: from clark ([192.107.36.171]) by sugar.pharlap.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.2 release 221 ID# 0-56365U200L2S100V35) with SMTP id com; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 09:55:43 -0400 From: clark@pharlap.com (Clark Jarvis) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 09:56:26 -0400 To: "Andy V. Oleynik" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <37A00865.5F2DA0F2@prime.net.ua> Subject: Re: too many stray irq 7's; not logging any more. Solved X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v1.60 b60 Message-ID: <19990729135543984.AAA82@sugar.pharlap.com@clark> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In <37A00865.5F2DA0F2@prime.net.ua>, on 07/29/99 at 10:53 AM, "Andy V. Oleynik" said: >Thanks a lot. Fixed. But it looks starange for irq7 >'cos of my card is on irq10 so following U it must be >stray irq15? [stuff deleted] The problem could be somewhere else, or the stray-IRQ code could be reporting it incorrectly. A stray IRQ15 (on the second PIC) requires that an interrupt be acknowledged on the first PIC, also. Could just be a reporting error. But, I'm really speculating now - I'll stop before I get in any deeper... -- Clark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message