From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Nov 14 04:16:38 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA23812 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 04:16:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from beta.mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (beta.mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de [134.147.6.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA23806 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 04:16:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roberte@beta.mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de) Received: (from roberte@localhost) by beta.mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA09316 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 13:16:32 +0100 (MEZ) From: Robert Eckardt Message-Id: <199711141216.NAA09316@beta.mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> Subject: NIS/YP (again :-) To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 13:16:31 +0100 (MEZ) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31H (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, once again I have to bother you with a question on NIS/YP on 2.2.2-RELEASE machines. How can I avoid that the NIS master server tries to push maps to itself ? This fails because yppush: status returned by ypxfr: Master's version not newer Another "problem", which may be related to the NIS configuration is that I don't get the entry of the GECOS field for one NIS user in sendmail's `vrfy' on the NIS master server -- just the itself -- though I can see no difference in his and other's entries in the NIS master.passwd. It works, however, on other machines which are bound the the same NIS server. TIA, Robert -- Dr. Robert Eckardt ( Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum, Inst.f.Theor.Physik, NB6/169 ) Universitaetsstrasse 150, D-44780 Bochum, Germany ----X---8---- Telefon: +49 234 700-3709, Telefax: +49 234 7094-574 8 E-Mail: RobertE@MEP.Ruhr-Uni-Bochum.de --------8---- URL: http://WWW.MEP.Ruhr-Uni-Bochum.de/~roberte >>> A magician never reveals his secret: the unbelievable trick becomes <<< >>> simple and obvious once it is explained. <<<