From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 21 06:13:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2720C106564A for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049548FC19 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p6L6DE6w041210 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:13:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p6L6DEk1041209; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA22452; Wed, 20 Jul 11 23:02:42 PDT Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:03:05 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: luvbeastie@larseighner.com Message-Id: <4e282389.Xp4wlKlnQhE/B3qm%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to add sio to 8.2 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:13:16 -0000 Lars Eighner wrote: > I've come to the conclusion that I need sio to be able to use 8.x. > > Can it be as simple as just dropping the code from 7.x into the > source for 8.x and adding a line to the kernel configuration? > > Or would this be fraught with all kinds of deep traps? sio(4) was replaced by uart(4) as part of the Giant retirement. Depending on what you need that uart(4) does not currently have, it might be easier to improve uart(4) than to resurrect sio(4).