From nobody Thu Aug 22 15:39:03 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WqS6g6NJQz5T7wp for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=MuLc=PV=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WqS6f4pKYz4tSJ for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:39:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=MuLc=PV=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=quip.cz header.s=private header.b="dGslqz/X"; dkim=pass header.d=quip.cz header.s=private header.b=nTA0FPvT; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of "SRS0=MuLc=PV=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz" has no SPF policy when checking 94.124.105.4) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=MuLc=PV=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz" Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C2BD78B5 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:39:04 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quip.cz; s=private; t=1724341144; bh=+s2+05/9xFlbxVs+aGyZresDvLE6lbRHJUvT+l1YmyU=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=dGslqz/Xn2FnM5hmcmTtHDNyK1waLtraAasbIb36H+tDVx1AwlM6ogJ9z7BSoIVRm 3uc7xcRUDMR3lUGEXxf3DFvLmj8qh0BRfW0vKjyymuxe+2XMbxVaM/VStLL3GjbCK8 yAAV+5bmjedwL4b1C+/oHDifDPPliONwgbwikeL8= Received: from [192.168.145.49] (ip-89-177-27-225.bb.vodafone.cz [89.177.27.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECBB0D78A9 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:39:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quip.cz; s=private; t=1724341143; bh=+s2+05/9xFlbxVs+aGyZresDvLE6lbRHJUvT+l1YmyU=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=nTA0FPvT4qBqyVL6EAwEAZomre/gCzKGX9QR7x+IUCrhmQ5Ue5c3tib29UY/fOfPR cpTiIWUQ3GAiSJDSIzt5b8CXUjzBJEDrfS0aMvBQPpM/IyKCVtPqtjguubLmN5L1ru ksxJMpKsYmEpspMx1FuuI1/dLj4izpp++beWKgIM= Message-ID: <64161a04-57b2-44ab-9e7e-b313a7d50a08@quip.cz> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:39:03 +0200 List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: makefs -t ffs makes too large image To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <1781435895.20240822135231.ref@yahoo.com> <1781435895.20240822135231@yahoo.com> <334195982.20240822182405@yahoo.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <334195982.20240822182405@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=MuLc=PV=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[quip.cz:s=private]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quip.cz]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42000, ipnet:94.124.104.0/21, country:CZ]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=MuLc=PV=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[quip.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WqS6f4pKYz4tSJ On 22/08/2024 17:24, Anthony Pankov wrote: > Hello Miroslav, > > You are genius! > > But the situation is a very frustrating. It is a default system and I did nothing to turn the compression on. > So I was absolutely sure that compression is off. > > I'm sorry. > Nevertheless having compression on by default is a very weird decision and is fully unexpected for me. I've never seen a big warning about default value of this vital parameter will be inverted. 100 people, 100 tastes :) In fact, the compression is the first thing I turn on on each newly created pool (if it isn't the default). Kind regards Miroslav Lachman