From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Aug 31 2:13:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from alisier.wanadoo.fr (smtp-rt-9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.19.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC4D37B401; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 02:13:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pcasidy@casidy.com) Received: from citronier.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.222) by alisier.wanadoo.fr; 31 Aug 2001 10:45:22 +0200 Received: from greatoak.home (193.248.218.114) by citronier.wanadoo.fr; 31 Aug 2001 10:45:02 +0200 Received: (from pcasidy@localhost) by greatoak.home (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f7V8IQ645101; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:18:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pcasidy) Message-Id: <200108310818.f7V8IQ645101@greatoak.home> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:18:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Philippe CASIDY Subject: Re: Which one to choose between devel/gettext and devel/gettext-devel To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: roam@ringlet.net, sobomax@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <3B8E0CA7.4F398F69@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thanks for all you who answered my question! On 30 Aug, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Don't really bother. The gettext-devel creates its PLIST on the fly, so content of > ports/devel/gettext-devel/pkg-plist is irrelevant. To answer the original question, yes, you > need both these ports, because binary utilities from the old gettext can't handle some files But installing two ports with the same PORTNAME will mess up the ports system, isn't it? Anyway, I will give it a try... Phil. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message