From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 21:26:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B6A90A for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 21:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2367C0B for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 21:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id q107so6144591qgd.29 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=53PwHMBrqcnEMfm9rTTdQV7JyXkc579LUJivwecgj/s=; b=XaY4WKk+t9r5oyYwjTLnXp9CJBoX0ga0/E0piM5k1GqYx/jZIYM10MbG+91PhikUbI YluIKPjv8QRUdBceBOPwfp7PEqcV8yI3LRtR7ShYOQHgI+ROhcdez5zbymy3xeG5MJbr IsiKzessTS/GT7NNbgr/3JFiCNlieCVnPUEDs+b9Qt3/NlynjkpfAOre1tL+iOojNz+I kjf+cPM1MjF7J3G3PQOP2CEr5voV9mhwBL1rLFbXKhBJQeocZhRy48ki3TN881NWSjMd 0DafGpnS/dIENpYANluWISOi+x0GdoJ8lrlgbKj0kH8/1MLgl95lMozWpoHiti/YjPx4 8anw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.22.209 with SMTP id 75mr24745054qgn.4.1399757158918; Sat, 10 May 2014 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.191.201 with HTTP; Sat, 10 May 2014 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20140226123709.GA31099@syn.pertho.net> <530EE7F4.3080903@shurik.kiev.ua> <24791.1393550277@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <75498.1398751548@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <84650.1398819225@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <14909.1399545008@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <20396.1399607298@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 14:25:58 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LohFLfc35OxeSxmIsR5NBdZv6Jo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Centrino Wireless-N 1000 support is also broken (Re: iwn(4) in -HEAD supporting Centrino Wireless-N 135) From: Adrian Chadd To: Kaho Toshikazu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 21:26:00 -0000 committed! Thanks! -a On 8 May 2014 21:09, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Ok, lemme commit the config fix. > > Thanks for persisting with this! > > > -a > > > On 8 May 2014 20:48, Kaho Toshikazu wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >>> So what's the value of txchainmask and rxchainmask from the EEPROM? >>> before things get overridden? >>> >>> I'd like to figure out what that changed. >> >> In both before and after applying the patch, sc->txchainmask=1, >> sc->rxchainmask=3, ntxsteams=1. I think that 1st breakage >> introduced by r258030 in the function iwn_set_link_quality() >> was already fixed by r258085. >> >> 2nd breakage introduced by r258035 seems to be fixed by the patch. >> Because 2nd breakage was introduced before 1st breakage was fixed, >> we faced to a difficulty tracking down the problem. >> I don't know a meaning of a parameter .calib_need, >> but it is something wrong and it is corrected by the patch. >> >> -- >> Kaho Toshikazu >> >>