From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Apr 11 13:11:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC5C37BB83 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:11:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA18418 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:11:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id WAA00282 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:11:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D1337B98C for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:56:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 258631C4A; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:56:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:56:55 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Michael Schuster - TSC SunOS Germany , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Import of tcsh into src/contrib/, replacing src/usr.bin/csh Message-ID: <20000411145655.A23367@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <38F2D225.1BABE12C@germany.sun.com> <200004111506.IAA33450@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200004111506.IAA33450@apollo.backplane.com>; from dillon@apollo.backplane.com on Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 08:06:46AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 08:06:46AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > My only issue is basically that I don't see any purpose to replacing the > /bin/csh binary, and there are many pitfalls (like people beginning to > write #!/bin/csh scripts that assume tcsh extensions). Just have both, > and if a few people think it wastes too much space well too bad, they > can delete one or the other. Case in point: All the scripts that say #!/bin/sh and were written by someone who assumes /bin/sh is bash. Not that any specific type of coders always tend to do that... -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect Computer Horizons Corp - CVM e-mail: billf@chc-chimes.com / billf@FreeBSD.org Office: 800-252-2421 x128 / Cell: 248-761-7272 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message