From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 11 19:50:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF24D1065676 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44648FC18 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8BJo3AC097528 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8BJo34V097527; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:50:03 GMT Message-Id: <200909111950.n8BJo34V097527@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Pedro Giffuni Cc: Subject: Re: i386/67383: [i386] [patch] do a better job disassembling code in 16 bit mode (patch from DragonflyBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pedro Giffuni List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:50:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR i386/67383; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pedro Giffuni To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: i386/67383: [i386] [patch] do a better job disassembling code in 16 bit mode (patch from DragonflyBSD) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:23:04 -0700 (PDT) I now think we should close this PR: It wouldn't seem a good idea to go int= o the=0Atrouble of adding more parameters to the dbb functions.=0A=0A=0A=0A=