From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Oct 29 22:41:40 1995 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id WAA07168 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 22:41:40 -0800 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA07147 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 22:41:36 -0800 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id HAA27036 ; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 07:41:32 +0100 Received: from (uucp@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with UUCP id HAA10744 ; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 07:41:31 +0100 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.7.1/keltia-uucp-2.6) id AAA01904; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 00:07:15 +0100 (MET) From: Ollivier Robert Message-Id: <199510292307.AAA01904@keltia.freenix.fr> Subject: Re: moving some mail. To: taob@io.org (Brian Tao) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 00:07:14 +0100 (MET) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, jmb@kryten.atinc.com, chat@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Brian Tao" at Oct 29, 95 04:30:47 pm X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT ctm#1270 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8b] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk It seems that Brian Tao said: > > I think what *really* needs to happen is for sendmail to get a lot > > smarter about this.. > > Why not replace it with smail or zmailer? You won't gain in term of system load. Many people have seen that sendmail 8.x handles big load better than either smail or zmailer. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #3: Wed Oct 25 02:00:10 MET 1995