From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 12 18:08:43 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C219210656C0;
	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:08:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A588FC2D;
	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:08:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [192.168.1.156] (adsl-241-168-59.bna.bellsouth.net
	[74.241.168.59]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2CI7Jpl026209
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:07:20 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org)
From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org>
To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200903120942.44149.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200903111233.14029.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<200903111507.42241.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<1236836518.1651.0.camel@wombat.2hip.net>
	<200903120942.44149.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: FreeBSD
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:08:32 -0500
Message-Id: <1236881312.15631.2.camel@wombat.2hip.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL,
	RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] amd64 suspend/resume code to be comitted
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:08:44 -0000

On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 09:42 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Thursday 12 March 2009 01:41 am, Robert Noland wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 15:07 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 11 March 2009 02:52 pm, Robert Noland wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 12:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > > > With popular demands, I will commit the following patch in
> > > > > next few days unless a showstopper is found or
> > > > > "over-my-dead-body" type of review is received. ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amd64_suspend-20090311.diff
> > > > >
> > > > > FYI, it was originally posted here:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810211228.31028.jkim
> > > > >
> > > > > and here:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812102120.03788.jkim
> > > > >
> > > > > Please read the original threads for more information about
> > > > > the patch.
> > > >
> > > > Does this address SMP as well?  Or is that still hanging out in
> > > > the wind?
> > >
> > > Yes, it does.
> >
> > Cool, looking forward to it...
> 
> Wait a minute.  Are you talking about SMP i386?  If so, the answer to 
> that question is no although it will be relatively easy to do fix 
> after the patch.  This patch only address UP/SMP amd64.

Oh, well... This is at least great progress... I was more interested in
this when I was using a dual core laptop, but it's great that it's
finally going in.

robert.

> Jung-uk Kim