From owner-cvs-all Sat Dec 9 16:47:17 2000 From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 9 16:47:13 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474FF37B400; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 16:47:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from adlmail.cup.hp.com (adlmail.cup.hp.com [15.0.100.30]) by palrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154B116B0; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 16:47:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from cup.hp.com (p1000180.nsr.hp.com [15.109.0.180]) by adlmail.cup.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with ESMTP id QAA06074; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 16:47:07 -0800 (PST) Sender: marcel@cup.hp.com Message-ID: <3A32D28B.C4F61AD1@cup.hp.com> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 16:47:07 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: Hewlett-Packard X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linprocfs placement... References: <200012091325.eB9DPsN51281@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001209105657.B23013@dragon.nuxi.com> <20001209123033.A24013@dragon.nuxi.com> <3A32A704.F5AFD02B@cup.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Linprocfs is totally independent of the linuxulator, and doesn't need > it to run. Ah, ok. I thought it needed the Linuxulator. > Ideally, once it becomes machine-independent (or at least > runs on more platforms than just i386), it should move to > /sys/compat/linprocfs. I'd rather *not* see it integrated into the > linuxulator, as that would make it a *lot* more difficult for me to > maintain (I'd have to kill any Linux binaries I have running every > time I want to test a change) I see your point. In that case I prefer it if linprocfs is moved from under the linux subdirectory to a place of it's own. It now has no business their at all. Where linprocfs should be moved to is not exactly clear. It started off in sys/miscfs and moved to sys/i386/linux. Moving it again to, say, sys/i386 might not make everybody happy. All this moving gets you thinking that we're simply not doing it right... I really think we should integrate... I guess we don't get anywhere this way, so I'll shut up... :-/ -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message