Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Nov 2001 01:46:14 -0800 (PST)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org>
Cc:        "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@packetdesign.com>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RFC: MFC M_ZERO usage for bpf.c
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111280145040.13845-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011127115755.A1151@iguana.aciri.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:52:49PM -0500, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
> > 
> > Just as a note, I decided against MFC'ing this and similar changes because
> > I didn't feel it was necesary for -STABLE to have this "fix."
> 
> why not ? code is more compact (and cache friendly) and readable,
> diffs from HEAD are reduced, no functional changes... I see only
> good things in these MFCs.
> 
> While we are on the topic, I would also love to see more consistency
> in the use of macros vs. inline functions. E.g. below we have
> 
>     MALLOC(d, struct bpf_d *, sizeof(*d), M_BPF, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO);
> 
> and
> 
>     bp = (struct bpf_if *)malloc(sizeof(*bp), M_BPF, M_DONTWAIT | M_ZERO);
> 


why cast the thing?  it returns a void *
which obviates the need for any casting....



> and the same occurs elsewhere for free() and FREE(). This is confusing
> because it leads you into thinking that they are two different things
> while they are not.
> 
> 	cheers
> 	luigi
> 
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> > 
> > :Hi--
> > :
> > :I've been reading through src/sys/net/bpf.c, and I noticed that the
> > :changes to make it use M_ZERO haven't been MFC-ed to RELENG_4 yet.  Any
> > :objection if I do this?  (Nothing broke in my quick testing.)
> > :
> > :Thanks,
> > :
> > :Bruce.
> > :
> > :Index: bpf.c
> > :===================================================================
> > :RCS file: /usr/ncvs/src/sys/net/bpf.c,v
> > :retrieving revision 1.59.2.6
> > :diff -u -r1.59.2.6 bpf.c
> > :--- bpf.c	20 Sep 2001 14:31:33 -0000	1.59.2.6
> > :+++ bpf.c	27 Nov 2001 18:49:45 -0000
> > :@@ -358,8 +358,7 @@
> > : 	if (d)
> > : 		return (EBUSY);
> > : 	make_dev(&bpf_cdevsw, minor(dev), 0, 0, 0600, "bpf%d", lminor(dev));
> > :-	MALLOC(d, struct bpf_d *, sizeof(*d), M_BPF, M_WAITOK);
> > :-	bzero(d, sizeof(*d));
> > :+	MALLOC(d, struct bpf_d *, sizeof(*d), M_BPF, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO);
> > : 	dev->si_drv1 = d;
> > : 	d->bd_bufsize = bpf_bufsize;
> > : 	d->bd_sig = SIGIO;
> > :@@ -1285,11 +1284,10 @@
> > : 	u_int dlt, hdrlen;
> > : {
> > : 	struct bpf_if *bp;
> > :-	bp = (struct bpf_if *)malloc(sizeof(*bp), M_BPF, M_DONTWAIT);
> > :+	bp = (struct bpf_if *)malloc(sizeof(*bp), M_BPF, M_DONTWAIT | M_ZERO);
> > : 	if (bp == 0)
> > : 		panic("bpfattach");
> > : 
> > :-	bp->bif_dlist = 0;
> > : 	bp->bif_ifp = ifp;
> > : 	bp->bif_dlt = dlt;
> > : 
> > :
> > :
> > :
> > 
> > --
> > Andrew R. Reiter
> > arr@watson.org
> > arr@FreeBSD.org
> > 
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0111280145040.13845-100000>