Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:19:46 -0800 (PST) From: "Freddie Cash" <fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't make INDEX-5 Message-ID: <1027.24.71.130.94.1076905186.squirrel@mailtest.sd73.bc.ca> In-Reply-To: <20040216035138.GA70526@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040216002301.GA62519@xor.obsecurity.org><4907.24.71.130.94.1076903325.squirrel@mailtest.sd73.bc.ca> <20040216035138.GA70526@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 07:48:45PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: >> I've cvsup'd the ports tree again this afternoon. I've forced a reinstall >> of perl 5.8.2. Doing a "make index" in /usr/ports still results in a 0 byte >> INDEX-5. >> I've got /usr/ports symlinked to /usr/local/ports due to space constraints. >> Could this be affecting the output of make index in any way? > Possibly; there's an open PR about this. Does it work if you don't > symlink it, or if you set PORTSDIR=/usr/local/ports? Hmmm, not sure what did it, but I cvsup'd again and ran through a make index without problems. I now have an INDEX-5 file with 10,351 ports listed in it. portsdb -u ran through perfectly, as do the rest of the port* tools in portupgrade, and pkg_version. How bizare, how bizarre. -- Freddie Cash fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1027.24.71.130.94.1076905186.squirrel>