Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Jun 2015 22:04:30 -0400
From:      Quartz <quartz@sneakertech.com>
To:        Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>,  Chris Stankevitz <chrisstankevitz@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Corrupt GPT on ZFS full-disks that shouldn't be using GPT
Message-ID:  <5590A7AE.9040303@sneakertech.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1506281526030.60581@wonkity.com>
References:  <CAPi0psvpvO4Kpbietpzyx1TjyB20hWV%2BCK-y3bWG4OARE1VMSg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1506280019400.14091@wonkity.com> <CAPi0psv7io6dhqbNxm6gp%2BW1npmNoU1agF%2Bt=7aEteNmpzqJXQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1506281526030.60581@wonkity.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Remember, ZFS
> leaves space unused at the end of a disk to allow for variations in
> nominal disk size.

Holy what the heck, no it doesn't! One big issue with zfs is that you 
CANNOT shrink a pool's size once it's been created, for any reason. You 
can't remove vdevs, and any replacement disk must bigger or exactly 
equal in size; even a disk with one less sector and you're SOL. This is 
my biggest gripe with zfs by far and in fact I just asked freebsd-fs 
about this less than a week ago wondering if it had been addressed 
finally (it hasn't).





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5590A7AE.9040303>