Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:16:08 -0400 From: "Scott Ullrich" <sullrich@gmail.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is IPSec NAT-T support? Message-ID: <d5992baf0609041116k2a2bb6a3hf3728f615cb09d47@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060904180515.V44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20060905022120.19c6d62d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <d5992baf0609041024q111de4d6t606266cf48b2d67a@mail.gmail.com> <20060904172700.W44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <d5992baf0609041045s417548e9m732d1c4443a75702@mail.gmail.com> <20060904175127.F44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <d5992baf0609041059k6585725bhe9a39fbae27c40c1@mail.gmail.com> <20060904180515.V44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/4/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > the patch only support kame ipsec. I guess that's the problem. Could > you try it building with kame ipsec instead of fast_ipsec and let us > know if that worked? That may work okay but then would I loose HIFN support, etc? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d5992baf0609041116k2a2bb6a3hf3728f615cb09d47>