Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 18:52:06 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Should/does loader.efi respect the "bootme" GPT attribute ? Message-ID: <62922.1608231126@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfpHzPt8Nr0BS9u=J7dCWP9SjpRWfurwEfTUiCO%2B7XK6rA@mail.gmail.com> References: <25469.1608040822@critter.freebsd.dk> <CANCZdfpcrXcgnh1O74A-MhSO2NFqTtq0rJrBDpEfwgxbVDPN8A@mail.gmail.com> <26111.1608051101@critter.freebsd.dk> <CANCZdfqhi742n9V%2BwCzhniB3QU5Equo%2BsnEOz0xQ2GmPKo27PQ@mail.gmail.com> <63257157-9cdd-0da4-f061-4005319514c2@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfpHzPt8Nr0BS9u=J7dCWP9SjpRWfurwEfTUiCO%2B7XK6rA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- Warner Losh writes: > > > UEFI has its own bootnext protocol, that works in conjunction with = the EFI > > > environment variables to have a more robust, less 'guess what I mea= n' > > > approach. So all in all, it's hard, non-standard and doesn't play w= ell with > > > UEFI." > > > > Could it be used here? > > > > Yes. It can. Do you know of any good sources of documentation ? -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62922.1608231126>